In a world where drones are becoming as ubiquitous as smartphones, Missouri is taking a stand against foreign-made unmanned aerial systems. House Bill 210, dubbed the “Unmanned Aerial Systems Security Act of 2025,” is stirring up controversy as it seeks to restrict government agencies from using drones manufactured in countries deemed security risks—primarily China. But while the bill aims to safeguard sensitive data, it’s facing fierce pushback from law enforcement, who argue it could cripple their ability to protect the public.

The Battle Over Data Security

At the heart of HB 210 is a concern over data security. The bill targets drones made in countries like China, Russia, and Iran, citing fears that these devices could be used to spy on U.S. infrastructure or leak sensitive information to foreign adversaries. Under the proposed law, government agencies would be barred from purchasing, acquiring, or using drones—or even related services—from manufacturers based in or controlled by these nations.

The legislation introduces a tiered security framework to classify drones based on their data capabilities:

  • Tier One: Drones that don’t collect, transmit, or receive data during flight (e.g., educational drones).
  • Tier Two: Drones that handle only flight control data, with strict encryption requirements.
  • Tier Three: Drones that collect visual or auditory data, mandating U.S.-based data storage and restricted remote access.

The bill also requires the Department of Transportation to identify and geofence “sensitive locations,” such as military bases and power plants, where drone flights would be restricted.

Law Enforcement Pushes Back

While the bill’s intentions are clear, its potential consequences are murkier. During a recent public hearing, Missouri law enforcement officials voiced strong objections, arguing that the restrictions could hinder their ability to respond to emergencies, conduct investigations, and maintain public safety.

“This bill could ground our operations,” one officer testified. “We rely on these drones for everything from search-and-rescue missions to crime scene analysis. Replacing our entire fleet would be costly and time-consuming.”

To ease the transition, HB 210 includes a reimbursement program for agencies needing to upgrade their drones. However, the funding is subject to appropriation, leaving many departments uncertain about their financial future.

A Global Trend or a Local Overreach?

Missouri isn’t alone in its concerns about foreign-made drones. Similar legislation has been proposed at the federal level, reflecting growing unease over the dominance of Chinese drone manufacturers like DJI in the global market. But critics argue that existing regulations already address security concerns, making HB 210 an unnecessary burden.

As the bill moves through the legislative process, further debate and potential amendments are expected. Will Missouri set a precedent for other states, or will the pushback from law enforcement and other stakeholders force a rethink?